Control plane and worker boundary already exist in-repo
FoundationThe current foundation already separates workflow control from document-intelligence execution.
PO Walls helps finance teams verify supplier details, review invoices safely, and stop risky payment changes before approval.
Verify before money moves.
PO Walls is being built around supplier trust, invoice context, masked review, and explicit reveal or approval controls instead of scattered checks across inboxes and spreadsheets.
The site does not blur current foundation with future delivery. That matters when the product is pre-release and the control model is more important than hype.
The current foundation already separates workflow control from document-intelligence execution.
The data shape is designed around workspace isolation and durable review state, even before the full product UI lands.
PO Walls is being built in a clear order: trust data, intake, deterministic review, alerts, then hardening and mailbox surfaces.
The roadmap builds PO Walls in the same order an AP team feels the risk: trust state first, controlled intake second, explainable review third, and a preserved decision trace after that.
Build a customer-local source of truth for suppliers, contacts, domains, and payment methods so reviewers stop relying on scattered context.
Bring uploads into a tenant-aware workflow with durable jobs, object storage references, and explicit file lifecycle handling.
Compare extracted invoice fields to trusted supplier data and keep sensitive bank details masked until someone has the right context.
Preserve the reasoning around supplier updates, review actions, and suspicious events so auditability is built into the workflow.
PO Walls is designed around trusted supplier data rather than ad hoc reference checks at approval time.
The roadmap centers review around document data, trusted supplier context, and explainable matching outcomes.
Sensitive bank data is intended to stay behind explicit permissions and controlled reveal flows.
The product direction prioritizes deterministic controls and traceable decisions over opaque scoring.
A barrier before approval. A cleaner trust model before the next supplier change. A review screen that shows why something is safe, mismatched, unknown, or worth a second look.
Workspaces, memberships, invoices, suppliers, jobs, and notifications already exist in the foundational schema.
The next product layer is a maintainable source of truth for supplier trust, payable accounts, and payment-method history.
PO Walls is being built around explainable match and mismatch outcomes rather than black-box fraud decisions.
Gmail and Outlook concepts are explicitly on the post-MVP roadmap, not part of the current product promise.
The public site represents a pre-release product. The repo already contains the control-plane foundation, worker contract, and foundational schema, while the product workflows are still being implemented across the published roadmap.
No. PO Walls is framed as supplier payment protection for AP teams. The name points to payables and payment operations, not to a purchase-order workflow.
The product narrative is centered on verification, masking, permissioned reveal, and explainable payment decisions instead of raw extraction or automation volume alone.
Book a demo conversation to walk through the roadmap, the current repo foundation, and the AP workflows PO Walls is designed to protect.